2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-0138-9_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oncobox Method for Scoring Efficiencies of Anticancer Drugs Based on Gene Expression Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering that MGMT is the major molecular determinant of chemoresistance to TMZ in GB [3,43], the latter finding suggests that recGBs may be less responsive to TMZ than ndGBs. To validate this assumption, we modelled the responsiveness to TMZ by calculating a metric termed the balanced efficiency score (BES), which is a numeric measure of drug response that can be predicted using expression levels of genes, the function of which is essential in determining tumor sensitivity to a given drug [47]. Demonstrating the adequacy of the BES ranking approach, a subset of ndGBs for which the information on progression free survival (PFS) was available (n = 16) showed a statistically significantly association between BES-TMZ > 0 and increased PFS (HR = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.088-0.96, p = 0.043) ( Figure 7C).…”
Section: Recgb-derived Gscs Retain Transcriptomic Patterns Associatedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering that MGMT is the major molecular determinant of chemoresistance to TMZ in GB [3,43], the latter finding suggests that recGBs may be less responsive to TMZ than ndGBs. To validate this assumption, we modelled the responsiveness to TMZ by calculating a metric termed the balanced efficiency score (BES), which is a numeric measure of drug response that can be predicted using expression levels of genes, the function of which is essential in determining tumor sensitivity to a given drug [47]. Demonstrating the adequacy of the BES ranking approach, a subset of ndGBs for which the information on progression free survival (PFS) was available (n = 16) showed a statistically significantly association between BES-TMZ > 0 and increased PFS (HR = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.088-0.96, p = 0.043) ( Figure 7C).…”
Section: Recgb-derived Gscs Retain Transcriptomic Patterns Associatedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efficiencies of anticancer target drugs (ATDs) were simulated based on individual gene expression profiles according to Tkachev et al using as a metric the balanced efficiency score (BES) calculated for every ATD [47].…”
Section: In Silico Modeling Of Drug Efficienciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where PAL is Pathway activation level, n is number of genes in a pathway, average_gene_expression_cancer is geometrically averaged gene expression value in all samples of a given cohort (treatment responders or non-responders), and average_gene_expression_norm is geometrically averaged normalized gene expression value in control samples.Ranking of target cancer drugs using Balanced Efficiency Scores (BES) was performed as described previously (Poddubskaya et al 2019b;Buzdin et al 2018;Tkachev et al 2020). The Oncobox software returned personalized list of target drugs in descent order of predicted efficacy.…”
Section: Molecular Pathway Analysis and Ranking Of Target Drugsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of PALs were found to be characteristic for cancer drug response ( Zhu et al, 2015 ) and sensitivity to X-ray irradiation ( Sorokin et al, 2018 ), asthma ( Alexandrova et al, 2016 ), Hutchinson-Gilford progeria ( Aliper et al, 2015 ), macular degeneration ( Makarev et al, 2014 ), fibrosis ( Makarev et al, 2016 ), viral infection ( Buzdin et al, 2016 ), and aging ( Aliper et al, 2016 ). Algorithms were developed to convert pathway activation data into the optimized selection of cancer drugs ( Artemov et al, 2015 ; Tkachev et al, 2020 ) that had several recent clinical applications ( Poddubskaya et al, 2018 , 2019a , b ; Sorokin et al, 2020b ). However, those studies used manually curated/annotated pathways and were, therefore, limited by the overall number (~10 or ~100) of pathways under analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%