Abstract:Although a stable team is deemed optimal for agile project success, new team members need to join ongoing agile projects. Newcomers must rapidly assimilate into the organisational and project environment while learning how to contribute effectively to the project and integrate into the team without seriously interrupting project progress. This paper addresses how newcomers integrate into an established agile project team and the challenges newcomers and the team face during this process. This paper is a single… Show more
“…We also found adjustments that had to be made by newcomers and the workplace to support integration, some of which were particularly related to an agile context. This paper extends a previous publication (Gregory et al, 2020) by adding more detail about the study, specifically the literature, research method, and participants. It also contains a more detailed presentation and discussion of the findings which leads to a new model of onboarding not previously presented.…”
“…We also found adjustments that had to be made by newcomers and the workplace to support integration, some of which were particularly related to an agile context. This paper extends a previous publication (Gregory et al, 2020) by adding more detail about the study, specifically the literature, research method, and participants. It also contains a more detailed presentation and discussion of the findings which leads to a new model of onboarding not previously presented.…”
“…Multiple records have described that new nurses feel overwhelmed in the transition from student towards their new role as nurse [ 57 , 62 , 75 , 77 ], which suggests supporting those healthcare workers during this transition period can be beneficial. In addition, onboarding, the terminology used to describe new employees joining and integrating into the organization [ 85 ], is an important item.…”
The shortage of healthcare workers is a growing concern. The COVID-19 pandemic and retirement wave have accelerated turnover rates. This systematic review aimed to identify and analyse the existing interventions for job retention of healthcare workers, in terms of nurses and physicians, in a hospital setting. A comprehensive search was conducted within three electronic databases, guided by the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analyses (PRISMA) and synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) guidelines, this resulted in 55 records that met the inclusion criteria. The intervention outcomes are categorized into substantial themes: onboarding, transition program to a different unit, stress coping, social support, extra staffing, coping with the demands of patient care, work relationships, development opportunities and department resources, job environment, work organization, recruitment approach, and technological innovations. Considering the literature, onboarding programs and mentoring for nurses and physicians are recommended. Additionally, other interventions described in this review could positively affect the retention of nurses and physicians. When selecting an intervention for implementation, managers and human resources should consider the intervention that matches the determinant of intention to leave of their healthcare workers and the hospital’s mission, vision, and values. Sharing the success stories of implemented interventions may benefit healthcare organizations.
“…Social and/or psychological effects of team stability Chiocchio et al, 17 Ji and Yan, 47 Rico et al, 48 Rejab et al, 49 Prikladnicki et al, 50 Britto et al 51 Supporting structures and task matching Lee et al, 52 Taylor, 53 Grass et al, 54 Dusenberry et al 55 Team coordination, formation and onboarding Berntzen et al, 56 Britto et al, 51 Ancona and Caldwell, 42 Prikladnicki et al, 50 Gregory et al, 57 Garnier et al, 58 Gregory et al, 59 Buchan et al 60 Impact of stability on team outcomes Zhou et al, 16 Chiocchio et al, 17 Ça glayan et al, 61 Cavalcante et al, 62 Rejab et al, 49 Fang, 63 Dayan and Benedetto, 64 Prikladnicki et al, 50 Ancona and Caldwell, 42 Crowder and Friess, 65 Sosa and Danilovic 66 Impact of composition and roles on team outcomes…”
Section: Theme Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other sources regard members joining and leaving teams as a natural part of self‐organization, allowing the team to adapt as conditions change 69 and identify factors such as team context, support, and leadership 54 as factors with considerably greater impact on outcomes than team longevity 55 . In studying challenges to team onboarding, Gregory et al 57 find that the majority of challenges are related to onboarding developers—particularly junior ones—who are unfamiliar with Agile approaches and need to adjust to the mindset of Agile principles, rather than any disturbance of the team dynamics as such (in a similar vein, adding new members who lack the appropriate skills will not improve team performance 58 ). They also identify multiple activities and principles that support onboarding of newcomers to a team, 59 which suggests that teaming should be considered an organizational capability in its own right and that it is a process that may be either fast or slow depending on how actively it is supported.…”
SummaryThe importance of the team, its internal dynamics, and its performance are widely recognized within the software engineering community. While popular frameworks identify wholeness, stability over time, and smallness as important factors, they offer little guidance on how to form teams that achieve these three characteristics. The objective of this study is to investigate how these team characteristics interact in large‐scale software development contexts, particularly focusing on the impact of stable and dynamic teaming approaches. This was done through a multivocal study of literature, followed by individual semi‐structured interviews with 19 engineers from two companies and validation workshops with an additional two companies from unrelated industry segments. The study results show that the question of stable versus dynamic approaches to forming software engineering teams is largely unaddressed in industry, with stable teams representing a habitual default option. Meanwhile, both stable and dynamic teams clearly have respective strengths and weaknesses, calling for careful consideration of the most suitable approach in any given situation. To support such consideration, this paper presents a model of how team stability, wholeness, and smallness interact. This model is found relevant, accurate, generalizable, and useful by practitioners.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.