On Your Mark, Ready, Search: A Framework for Structuring Literature Search Strategies in Information Systems

Schoormann, Thorsten; Behrens, Dennis; Fellmann, Michael; Knackstedt, Ralf

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-86790-4_38

Cited by 8 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…; How to communicate DPs to enable reuse in academia? (visual tools [28]) In summary, our work contributes to the core of the 'practical ethos' of DSR that requires its products to be reusable [4] by broadening the scope of reusability onto the academic domain and aim for a fruitful discussion on how to grow the body of prescriptive design knowledge. We outline our initial findings that conceptualize types of how others can use DPs to enhance their effectiveness and maturity.…”

Section: Discussion Conclusion and Future Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

How Do Researchers (Re-)Use Design Principles: An Inductive Analysis of Cumulative Research

Schoormann

Möller

Hansen

2021

The Next Wave of Sociotechnical Design

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Accumulating prescriptive design knowledge, such as design principles (DP), is one of the fundamental goals in design science research projects. As previous studies have examined the use of DPs in practice to advance the development and communication of such principles, we argue that this attention also needs to be paid to how and for what researchers (re-)use DPs. Hence, this paper explores DP usage in cumulative (information systems) research based on the analysis and coding of a sample of 114 articles with 226 in-text citations. In doing this, we aim at contributing to the valuable discourse on DP reuse and accumulation by focusing on usage in research, present preliminary types of DP usage extracted from cumulative literature, as well as raise the awareness for guiding user and designer in how to (re-)use and how to allow for reuse of DPs.

show abstract

Section: Discussion Conclusion and Future Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%