2007
DOI: 10.4310/cag.2007.v15.n5.a2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Yamabe constants of Riemannian products

Abstract: Abstract. For a closed Riemannian manifold (M m , g) of constant positive scalar curvature and any other closed Riemannian manifold (N n , h), we show that the limit of the Yamabe constants of the Riemannian products (M × N, g + rh) as r goes to infinity is equal to the Yamabe constant of (M m × R n , [g + g E ]) and is strictly less than the Yamabe invariant of S m+n provided n ≥ 2. We then consider the minimum of the Yamabe functional restricted to functions of the second variable and we compute the limit in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
77
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that Y (S n × S 1 ) = Y n+1 is one of the first things we learned about the Yamabe invariant [11,22]. One way to see this is as follows: first one notes that lim T →∞ Y (S n × S 1 , [1] (the Yamabe constant for a non-compact Riemannian manifold is computed as the infimum of the Yamabe functional over compactly supported functions). But the Yamabe function for g 0 + dt 2 is precisely the conformal factor between S n × R and S n+1 − {S, N }.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The fact that Y (S n × S 1 ) = Y n+1 is one of the first things we learned about the Yamabe invariant [11,22]. One way to see this is as follows: first one notes that lim T →∞ Y (S n × S 1 , [1] (the Yamabe constant for a non-compact Riemannian manifold is computed as the infimum of the Yamabe functional over compactly supported functions). But the Yamabe function for g 0 + dt 2 is precisely the conformal factor between S n × R and S n+1 − {S, N }.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a corollary to the previous theorem that this is actually true in the case n = 1. Namely, using the notation (as in [1])…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4]6,7,39]). In this article, we will present some extensions to Aubin's Lemma which will include, as a particular case, the first equality in the above working hypothesis (4). Therefore, by combining this with the inequality (3), the second inequality in (4) follows.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, using a similar argument to that in the proof of [2, Theorem 6.13] combined with the properties for G ∞ , G k in Lemma 2.1, we obtain (cf. [4])…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 14 and Corollary 16mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interest in finding all solutions of the Yamabe equation in this case comes from trying to compute the Yamabe constants and its limit lim δ→0 Y (S n ×S n , [g n 0 +δg n 0 ]) = Y (S n ×R n , g n 0 +dx 2 ) (see [2]). An important question raised in [2,3], related to the computations of these Yamabe constants, is whether all solutions of the Yamabe equation on certain Riemannian products, like products of spheres (or the product of a sphere with Euclidean space), depend on only one of the factors. The main goal of this article is to show the existence of solutions which depend non-trivially on both factors: positive solutions when p < p n and nodal solutions when p = p n .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%