2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.laa.2011.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Wold-type decomposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each k * -paranormal operator is (k + 1)-paranormal (cf. [11,Proposition 4.8]), so T is a k-paranormal operator. Thus…”
Section: The Pf Property For K * -Paranormal Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Each k * -paranormal operator is (k + 1)-paranormal (cf. [11,Proposition 4.8]), so T is a k-paranormal operator. Thus…”
Section: The Pf Property For K * -Paranormal Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [11] we have shown that k-paranormal, k * -paranormal, (p, k)-quasihyponormal contractions and contractions of class Q have the PF property (see also [3,4,6]). Our main purpose is to answer the question: Which of the above mentioned operators (not necessarily contractions) have the PF property?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is (n, k)-quasiparanormal if and only if T ∈ k-Q A(n). Pagacz [13,Proposition 4.8] proved that the class of * -n-paranormal operators is a subclass of the class of (n + 1)-paranormal operators. Zeng and Zhong [19, Theorem 2.1] proved that * -(n, k)-quasiparanormal operators are (n+1, k−1)-quasiparanormal.…”
Section: Lemma 42 Letmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An operator T belongs to class Q if 1 2 T 2 x 2 + 1 2 x 2 ≥ T x 2 for x ∈ H. It is known that the class Q contains the class of paranormal operators [13]. (2) Similarly, T * is of class Q if and only if T 2 T * 2 − 2T T * + I ≥ 0.…”
Section: Lemma 42 Letmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, T has to be a contraction. P. Pagacz showed that a contraction which belongs to the class Q, shares the PF property (see [40] and [38] for the paranormal case). This gives us that γ(A T * ,L ) > 0 is valid, which completes our proof.…”
Section: Proofsmentioning
confidence: 99%