2009
DOI: 10.1080/15459620903012028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Wiping the Interior Walls of 37-mm Closed-Face Cassettes: An OSHA Perspective

Abstract: As early as 1976, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) methods for analyzing metal samples collected using 37-mm polystyrene closed-face cassettes specified that any loose dust be transferred from the cassette to the digestion vessel, that the cassette be rinsed, and that, if necessary, the cassette be wiped out to help ensure that all particles that enter the cassette are included along with the filter as part of the sample for analysis. OSHA analytical methods for metal analysis were recently… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Significantly lower reproducibility for endotoxin concentrations was found when only the results for endotoxins collected on filter were considered. This can be explained by the variability and random nature of the quantity of deposits on the inner walls of the cassette during sampling (Demange et al, 1990;Hendricks et al, 2009).…”
Section: Concentration Ranges For the Generated Bioaerosols And Repromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significantly lower reproducibility for endotoxin concentrations was found when only the results for endotoxins collected on filter were considered. This can be explained by the variability and random nature of the quantity of deposits on the inner walls of the cassette during sampling (Demange et al, 1990;Hendricks et al, 2009).…”
Section: Concentration Ranges For the Generated Bioaerosols And Repromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amount of mass on the cassette walls did not correlate with mass on the C i filter (R 2 = 0.001). Nonetheless, more recent studies of cassette wall losses for routine workplace samples, i.e., the equivalent of C o samples in workplace studies, have lead OSHA to conclude “… wall deposits can often be a large and inconsistent fraction of the total sample.” (54, p. 734) The OSHA authors also noted that it is not possible to apply a correction factor to account for wall losses. As a result, OSHA’s laboratory now requires that internal cassette walls for all metal samples be wiped, and any mass collected included in the analytical result.…”
Section: Site Selection Subject Selection and Preparation Sampling mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collected particles will adhere to the internal surfaces of the closed faced cassettes during sample collection, transport, and handling (Baron 1998). Several methods have been proposed to account for this wall loss, including rinsing (Ashley et al 2001), wiping (Hendricks et al 2009), within-cassette dissolution (Fabriès 1985; Harper and Ashley 2012), and an internal capsule fused to the filter that could be digested with the filter (Harper and Ashley 2013). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%