1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0012-365x(96)00233-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On weakly connected domination in graphs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, E w ) (also called subgraph weakly induced by D) is connected, where E w is the set of all edges having at least one vertex in D. Dunbar et al [6] defined the weakly connected domination number γ w (G) of a graph G to be the minimum cardinality among all weakly connected dominating sets in G.…”
Section: Weakly Connected Domination Numbermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, E w ) (also called subgraph weakly induced by D) is connected, where E w is the set of all edges having at least one vertex in D. Dunbar et al [6] defined the weakly connected domination number γ w (G) of a graph G to be the minimum cardinality among all weakly connected dominating sets in G.…”
Section: Weakly Connected Domination Numbermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [1], Dunbar, et al, showed that every connected graph has a weakly connected independent dominating set. Thus, the i w (G) and β w (G) of a connected graph G always exist.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce the number of exchanged SYNC frames while maintaining the network connected, we structure it according to a Weakly Connected Dominating Set (WCDS) [6]. A WCDS is composed of independent clusters that can use different virtual channels for internal communication, which only requires maintaining synchronization inside one cluster.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%