2000
DOI: 10.1007/pl00000418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On wave equations with supercritical nonlinearities

Abstract: We prove that the solution operators e t 0Y y for the nonlinear wave equations with supercritical nonlinearities are not Lipschitz mappings from a subset of the finite-energy space H 1 L &1 Â L 2 to H s q H for t j 0, and 0 % s % 1Y n 1a1a2 À 1aq H 1. This is in contrast to the subcritical case, where the corresponding operators are Lipschitz mappings ([3], [6]). Here e t 0Y y uÁY t, where u is a solution ofwhere n^4Y m^0 and & b & Ã n 2an À 2 in the supercritical case.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…k = 1 or k = 2, or fails to be Lipschitz continuous. Among the recent works along these lines are [7], [24], 3 This (minimal) notion of local well-posedness is designed to provide meaning to rough solutions obtained through a limiting procedure of smooth functions. It differs subtly from what may be the "most natural" definition: For any R > 0 there exists T = T (R) > 0 such that the data-to-solution map S is uniformly continuous and uniquely defined from the ball {u0 ∈ H s x : u0 H s x < R} to the space C 0 ([−T, T ]; H s x ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…k = 1 or k = 2, or fails to be Lipschitz continuous. Among the recent works along these lines are [7], [24], 3 This (minimal) notion of local well-posedness is designed to provide meaning to rough solutions obtained through a limiting procedure of smooth functions. It differs subtly from what may be the "most natural" definition: For any R > 0 there exists T = T (R) > 0 such that the data-to-solution map S is uniformly continuous and uniquely defined from the ball {u0 ∈ H s x : u0 H s x < R} to the space C 0 ([−T, T ]; H s x ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10], [5] and [1]). Using constructions and ideas similar to those of Theorem 2.6 in the present paper, the authors proved in [6] that the solution operators for these nonlinear equations are not Lipschitz continuous as mappings from H 1 2 to L 2 for supercritical exponents ρ (ρ > 1 + 4 n−2 ). Related results for polynomial nonlinearities f have been obtained by Lebeau [14], [15].…”
Section: Definition 12 -A Family F Of Mappings Is Said To Admit Intmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…In the case of Sobolev spaces X = X ′ = H (s) (R n ) and p = 2. The integral transform K allows us to avoid consideration in the phase space and to apply immediately the well-known decay estimates for the solution of the wave equation (operator EE) (see, e.g., [2,3,18]).…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%