1958
DOI: 10.21136/cpm.1958.108301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On $W$-bases of directed graphs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By virtue of ( 14) and Remark 1, m L (1) = m Lc (0) − 1. The statements regarding L c follow from those about L; after that, (ii) and the assertions regarding P result from (10). The proof of (iv) is straightforward.…”
Section: ⊓ ⊔mentioning
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…By virtue of ( 14) and Remark 1, m L (1) = m Lc (0) − 1. The statements regarding L c follow from those about L; after that, (ii) and the assertions regarding P result from (10). The proof of (iv) is straightforward.…”
Section: ⊓ ⊔mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The assertions about L c follow from (10). The geometric multiplicities of the eigenvalues are the same, since the transformation ( 11) is nondegenerate: (12) defines its inverse.…”
Section: Laplacian Matrices and Stochastic Matricesmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fiedler and Sedláček [25] proved that the principal minor of the Laplacian matrix resulting by the removal of the rows and columns indexed by a set J is equal to the total weight of in-forests with |J | trees rooted at the vertices of J .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corollary 3.1 (Fiedler and Sedláček [12]) The number c(K r,s ) of spanning trees of the complete bipartite graph K r,s is…”
Section: Bipartite Trees and Tripartite Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%