The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1996
DOI: 10.1016/0377-0257(96)01470-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On vortex development in viscoelastic expansion and contraction flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2. Vortex sizes and intensities are smaller for the viscoelastic liquid, compared with the Newtonian, a finding also reported in previous studies under different conditions [4,5,8]. This effect is observed for the whole range of Re, from 0 to 100 (the exception being the size of the smaller vortex X r2 which is actually larger for the non-Newtonian fluid) and can be seen as a swelling-like phenomenon similar to that occurring in extrusion processes.…”
Section: Effect Of Inertia Resupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2. Vortex sizes and intensities are smaller for the viscoelastic liquid, compared with the Newtonian, a finding also reported in previous studies under different conditions [4,5,8]. This effect is observed for the whole range of Re, from 0 to 100 (the exception being the size of the smaller vortex X r2 which is actually larger for the non-Newtonian fluid) and can be seen as a swelling-like phenomenon similar to that occurring in extrusion processes.…”
Section: Effect Of Inertia Resupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Compared with other works, the present level of mesh refinement is similar to that used by Hawa and Rusak [13] (their base mesh had δx = 0.05) who solved the Newtonian problem with a vorticity/stream function formulation using a finite-difference method; in relation to works dealing with viscoelastic flow simulations in planar expansions at very low Re, Mesh-2 is much finer than those previously used [5,7,8]. Numerical accuracy was assessed for both Newtonian and viscoelastic fluids with a Reynolds number of 60, in the middle of the range here considered (Re = 0.01-100) but for which the flow is already asymmetric for both fluid types.…”
Section: Meshes and Quantification Of Accuracymentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, it has been found (Quinzani, Armstrong & Brown 1995) to be the best simple differential model to represent the elongational properties of polymer solutions in entry flows. For example, both Baaijens (1993) and Azaiez Guénette & Aït-Kadi (1996) have used the linearized form to predict the entry flow through the 4 : 1 planar contraction measured by Quinzani et al (1995); Baloch, Townsend & Webster (1996) have also used it to simulate both expansion and contraction flows. The exponential form of the PTT model gives a maximum of the elongational viscosity at a given level of strain rate in simple stretching flows, as is typical of some polymer melts; it was used, for example, by White & Baird (1988a, b) to simulate their own measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flows through two-dimensional expansion with expansion ratio of 3 : 40 at low Reynolds number were simulated for comparison with some cases in their experiments, and satisfactory agreement was obtained. Baloch et al [12] used the same method and viscoelastic constitutive model as used in Townsend and Walters [11] to simulate the two-dimensional expansion flows with expansion ratios of 3 : 40 and 1 : 80 at low Reynolds numbers (Re ≤ 4). The results for the flows with expansion ratio of 3 : 40 showed good qualitative agreement with some experimental cases conducted by Townsend and Walters [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%