2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jspi.2014.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On using the hypervolume indicator to compare Pareto fronts: Applications to multi-criteria optimal experimental design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
32
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…To compare the performance of PADE with that of other MOEAs, the hyper‐volume indicator used by another study are used.…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To compare the performance of PADE with that of other MOEAs, the hyper‐volume indicator used by another study are used.…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hybrid measures which overlap the above three categories have been also introduced in the literature. An example is the hypervolume measure, a well-established indicator of a front's quality [3][4].…”
Section: Pareto Optimality-dominance Relationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the solutions scaled to be between 0 and 1) obtained by the algorithm and the hypervolume enclosed by the standardized P F 351 ; (5) the CPU time (minutes) required for an algorithm to reach the stopping criterion; (6) N E; and (7) N C. Note that the hypervolume measure requires a user-defined reference point, which we choose to be r = (−0.0031, −0.0031, −0.0031) T , leading to a hypervolume of 0.6157 for the standardized P F 351 ; for justification and details see Cao et al (2015).…”
Section: Three-criteria Benchmark Examplementioning
confidence: 99%