2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2015.09.067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On using Pareto optimality to tune a linear model predictive controller for wind turbines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a multi-objective controller, the ratio between weights in the cost function balances the different control objectives. To find the right balance between the control objectives it is possible to sweep across the weight ratios to form Pareto fronts [32]. These Pareto fronts show the balance between the competitive objectives and can be used to tune the controller.…”
Section: A Pareto Optimal Tuningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a multi-objective controller, the ratio between weights in the cost function balances the different control objectives. To find the right balance between the control objectives it is possible to sweep across the weight ratios to form Pareto fronts [32]. These Pareto fronts show the balance between the competitive objectives and can be used to tune the controller.…”
Section: A Pareto Optimal Tuningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the multi-objective problem, several optimization strategies first form a cost function with weights for different objectives, then solve the optimization problem with the cost function. [24,25] introduced an optimization strategy based on Pareto efficiency to optimize the two-objective optimization problem based on the model predictive control. In this paper, the optimization problem has been divided into two parts and each part deals with two parameters.…”
Section: Coordinated Control Design Through Pareto and Pole Placementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general optimization method usually minimizes a cost function, however, the acquisition of the cost function is subjective. [24,25] proposed another method to solve the problem and optimized the weight matrix in model predictive control: by using the Pareto theory to qualitatively analyze two objectives and obtain a satisfactory solution by calculating the gradient. However, it is still meaningful to further analyze the controller coordination for the WTGS by optimizing the pole position, due to the essential characteristic with the high-order multi-inputs and multi-objectives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obviously, the above multi-objective H 2 /H ∞ control design needs to minimize J 2 and J ∞ simultaneously, which requires to seek Pareto optimal solutions to achieve the simultaneous minimization similarly as [31,32]. Herein, we adopt the loop algorithm to choose the Pareto optimal like point.…”
Section: X(n )} Y (I) = K(i)x(i)mentioning
confidence: 99%