2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2006.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On using alternative perturbation theory methodologies in the evaluation of reactivity effects in ADS cores

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Particularly noteworthy is the work by Pomraning, who laid out much of the general Since 2000, much less work has been done on variational methods applied to material density perturbations, although isolated papers occasionally appear for particular applications [32].…”
Section: Perturbation Theory and Variational Methods Applied To Matermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly noteworthy is the work by Pomraning, who laid out much of the general Since 2000, much less work has been done on variational methods applied to material density perturbations, although isolated papers occasionally appear for particular applications [32].…”
Section: Perturbation Theory and Variational Methods Applied To Matermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values obtained from the MCNP modeling and calculations are compared with the reference data, which is summarized in Table 3. The reference data have been calculated by Pelloni and Coddington (2006) with deterministic computational method. It can be seen that the calculated values are in good agreement with the reference data, and the relative errors of β eff and Λ are 1.6% and 2.4%, respectively.…”
Section: Verification Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the reference data are provided by some researchers (Pelloni and Coddington, 2006;Talamo and Gohar, 2008;Kiedrowski and Brown, 2009). The relative errors between the results of new method with reference data and prompt method for b eff are less than 1.0% and 3.1%, respectively.…”
Section: Benchmarks Verificationmentioning
confidence: 98%