2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11134-009-9125-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On upper bounds for the tail distribution of geometric sums of subexponential random variables

Abstract: The approach used by Kalashnikov and Tsitsiashvili for constructing upper bounds for the tail distribution of a geometric sum with subexponential summands is reconsidered. By expressing the problem in a more probabilistic light, several improvements and one correction are made, which enables the constructed bound to be significantly tighter. Several examples are given, showing how to implement the theoretical result.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case when (1) is not fulfilled, upper bounds for P(M > x) have been derived by Kalashnikov [11] and by Richards [17]. The approach in these papers is based on the representation of M as a geometric sum of independent random variables:…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case when (1) is not fulfilled, upper bounds for P(M > x) have been derived by Kalashnikov [11] and by Richards [17]. The approach in these papers is based on the representation of M as a geometric sum of independent random variables:…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This even remains valid, if we bound E[τ z ] in these inequalities by combining (15) or (16) with (14). The reason why we are able to obtain asymptotically precise bounds is, that we may choose z arbitrary large.…”
Section: Theorem 1 Assume Thatmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Comparing this with (4), we see that the inequalities in Theorem 7 are asymptotically precise. This even remains valid, if we bound E[τ z ] in these inequalities by combining (15) or (16) with (14). The reason why we are able to obtain asymptotically precise bounds is, that we may choose z arbitrary large.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Nevertheless some authors (see, e.g. [1,16]) show that the relative error in (1) can be big even for rather large values of x. The second way is to derive explicit bounds for the difference of the left and right sides of (1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such an approach was developed for regular varying and Weibull distributions B in [7][8][9][10]16]. For general τ, this approach is even less effective because of necessity for explicit estimates for renewal measure generated by the descending ladder hight.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%