2007
DOI: 10.3934/ipi.2007.1.95
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On uniqueness in the inverse conductivity problem with local data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
186
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(193 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
7
186
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, to the authors' knowledge, there are no uniqueness results similar to Theorem 1.1 with Dirichlet data supported and Neumann data measured on the same arbitrary open subset of the boundary, even for smooth potentials or conductivities. In dimension n ≥ 3 Isakov [17] proved global uniqueness assuming that Γ 0 is a subset of a plane or a sphere. In dimensions n ≥ 3, [8] proves global uniqueness in determining a bounded potential for the Schrödinger equation with Dirichlet data supported on the whole boundary and Neumann data measured in roughly half the boundary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, to the authors' knowledge, there are no uniqueness results similar to Theorem 1.1 with Dirichlet data supported and Neumann data measured on the same arbitrary open subset of the boundary, even for smooth potentials or conductivities. In dimension n ≥ 3 Isakov [17] proved global uniqueness assuming that Γ 0 is a subset of a plane or a sphere. In dimensions n ≥ 3, [8] proves global uniqueness in determining a bounded potential for the Schrödinger equation with Dirichlet data supported on the whole boundary and Neumann data measured in roughly half the boundary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By Lemma 5.3 we have the orthogonality relation: 15) where E 1 , E 2 ∈ H(curl , Ω b ) solve the problem (3.1)-(3.3) with q replaced by q 1 and q 2 , respectively. We now look for solutions to the problem (3.1)-(3.3) in the following form:…”
Section: Lemma 52 the Operator F Has A Dense Range Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uniqueness result for the inverse problem in this paper is most closely related in term of result and method of argument to Kirsch on the determination of the refractive index in the TE polarization. Inspired by [27] and [15], we obtain an orthogonality relation for two different refractive indexes by using a D-to-N map on an artificial boundary on which the tangential electric fields are identical for an integral type of incident electric field. It should be remarked that the method for constructing geometry optical solutions in [19,15,27] for non-periodic inverse conductivity problems does not work since the solutions are required to be quasi-periodic in the periodic case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Isakov [95] proved a uniqueness result in dimension three or higher when the DN map is given on an arbitrary part of the boundary assuming that the remaining part is an open subset of a plane or a sphere and the DN map is measured on the plane or sphere. The case of partial data on a slab was studied in [122].…”
Section: The Uniqueness Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%