2018
DOI: 10.1017/jpr.2018.31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On unimodality of the lifetime distribution of coherent systems with failure-dependent component lifetimes

Abstract: We study the conditions for unimodality of the lifetime distribution of a coherent system when the ordered component lifetimes in the system are described by generalized order statistics. Results for systems with independent and identically distributed lifetimes of components are included in this setting. The findings are illustrated with some examples for different types of systems. In particular, coherent systems with strictly bimodal density functions are presented in the case of independent standard unifor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 47 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The assumption is not very restrictive, because coherent systems with non-unimodal signatures are very rare. An example of a system of size 5 with bimodal signature was presented in Jasiński et al (2009), and the construction was extended to higher dimensions by Bieniek and Burkschat (2018). In the proof, we apply a characterization of unimodality based on sign change behavior (cf., e.g., Marshall and Olkin 2007, proof of Proposition B.2., p. 99).…”
Section: Unimodal Signaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assumption is not very restrictive, because coherent systems with non-unimodal signatures are very rare. An example of a system of size 5 with bimodal signature was presented in Jasiński et al (2009), and the construction was extended to higher dimensions by Bieniek and Burkschat (2018). In the proof, we apply a characterization of unimodality based on sign change behavior (cf., e.g., Marshall and Olkin 2007, proof of Proposition B.2., p. 99).…”
Section: Unimodal Signaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%