2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.cam.2006.03.059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On uniformly high-order accurate residual distribution schemes for advection–diffusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the first step, the Euler fluxes are approximated using the method of Section 3, and in the second one the viscous fluxes are approximated by a Galerkin variational formulation. This strategy has already been used in previous works on viscous RD schemes with some refinements when the Peclet becomes small since the viscous effects are predominant, see [32]. A formal justification of the method, in the P 1 case, can be found in [10] or in the Section 7.2.2.…”
Section: A Simple Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first step, the Euler fluxes are approximated using the method of Section 3, and in the second one the viscous fluxes are approximated by a Galerkin variational formulation. This strategy has already been used in previous works on viscous RD schemes with some refinements when the Peclet becomes small since the viscous effects are predominant, see [32]. A formal justification of the method, in the P 1 case, can be found in [10] or in the Section 7.2.2.…”
Section: A Simple Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this problem mixed schemes have been developed, in which RD methods for the advection terms are combined with the Galerkin discretization of the diffusion terms. For such type of schemes, a proper blending between the RD and the Galerkin schemes must be constructed otherwise the accuracy of the resulting schemes is spoiled when advection and diffusion are equally important [25,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As remarked in [23,29], this approach is not satisfactory because its accuracy is not uniform over the whole range of values of the mesh size, viscosity, local speeds. In particular, while on relatively coarse meshes second order is indeed obtained in practice, as one consider finer meshes only first order rates are observed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this method, RD is re-cast as a stabilized Galerkin discretization. By analogy with what is done in the SUPG and GLS case [19,18], in [29,37] a dependence of the stabilization term on the cell Peclet/Reynolds number is introduced so that in diffusion dominated regions the full Galerkin scheme is recovered, while the hybrid method is used in high Reynolds regions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation