1991
DOI: 10.1016/0010-4809(91)90033-s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On two weighted signal averaging methods and their application to the surface detection of cardiac micropotentials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1992
1992
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this method, a beat is rejected if its noise level is significantly greater than the mean of the noise levels of all beats previously accepted into the averaging process. c) Weighted averaging (WA): each beat is multiplied by a coefficient inversely proportional to its noise variance [3].…”
Section: Modeled Asmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this method, a beat is rejected if its noise level is significantly greater than the mean of the noise levels of all beats previously accepted into the averaging process. c) Weighted averaging (WA): each beat is multiplied by a coefficient inversely proportional to its noise variance [3].…”
Section: Modeled Asmentioning
confidence: 99%