1982
DOI: 10.1080/00036818208839372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On two methods for elimination of non-unique solutions of an integral equation with logarithmic kernel/

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results show how the condition number depends on the radius of the circle or the aspect ratio of the ellipse. Comparable results are given in [3]. In [4] and [5] the Laplace equation on a circle with Dirichlet boundary conditions is again investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The results show how the condition number depends on the radius of the circle or the aspect ratio of the ellipse. Comparable results are given in [3]. In [4] and [5] the Laplace equation on a circle with Dirichlet boundary conditions is again investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…has a non-trivial solution for 1 (s), where B d is the boundary of degenerate scale using the fundamental solution U(s, x) = ln(r) [13,[15][16][17][32][33][34]. For determining the degenerate scale systematically from one trial of a normal scale, we provide a flowchart as shown in Figure 2(a) and the numerical results as shown in Table I.…”
Section: Dual Boundary Integral Formulation and Dual Bem For Torsion mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Burton and Miller [3] solved the problem by combining singular and hypersingular equations with an imaginary constant. Chen et al [4] 235 methods to eliminate degenerate scale, scaling method and restriction method were discussed by Christiansen [33]. He also investigated the condition number of the influence matrix of the fictitious BEM and null-field approach [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The eigenvalues Xp have been discussed in the work of F. R. de Hoog [ 10] and S. Christiansen [7]. However, the eigenvalues A given in (4) In the following it is shown that co is an upper bound for \B |0, and that this bound becomes increasingly sharp as n -> co. Theorem 2 tells us that <y can be viewed essentially as the value of \B when n is sufficiently large.…”
Section: Collocation On a Circlementioning
confidence: 90%