2019
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1909.03624
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Two-Dimensional Steady Hypersonic-Limit Euler Flows Passing Ramps and Radon Measure Solutions of Compressible Euler Equations

Abstract: We proposed rigorous definitions of Radon measure solutions for boundary value problems of steady compressible Euler equations which modeling hypersonic-limit inviscid flows passing two-dimensional ramps, and their interactions with still gas and pressureless jets. We proved the Newton-Busemann pressure law of drags of body in hypersonic flow, and constructed various physically interesting measure solutions with density containing Dirac measures supported on curves, also exhibited examples of blow up of certai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, letting ν → +∞, using decay property of U w for x > ℓ w , and applying Theorem 1.1 on the L 1 difference estimate between U (τ ) w (x, •) and P (τ ) * (x − ℓ w )(U w (x, •)) for 0 < x < ℓ w , we can complete the proof of Theorem 1.2. Recently, the authors in [17,18,19,20] systematically studied the hypersonic limit, which is a different problem from ours since there is no hypersonic similarity structure. The reason is that the wedge angle (or cone angle) θ in [17,18,19,20] is fixed such that the similarity parameter K tends to the infinity as M ∞ → ∞.…”
Section: Definition 11 (Entropy Solutions) a Weak Solution Umentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, letting ν → +∞, using decay property of U w for x > ℓ w , and applying Theorem 1.1 on the L 1 difference estimate between U (τ ) w (x, •) and P (τ ) * (x − ℓ w )(U w (x, •)) for 0 < x < ℓ w , we can complete the proof of Theorem 1.2. Recently, the authors in [17,18,19,20] systematically studied the hypersonic limit, which is a different problem from ours since there is no hypersonic similarity structure. The reason is that the wedge angle (or cone angle) θ in [17,18,19,20] is fixed such that the similarity parameter K tends to the infinity as M ∞ → ∞.…”
Section: Definition 11 (Entropy Solutions) a Weak Solution Umentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Recently, the authors in [17,18,19,20] systematically studied the hypersonic limit, which is a different problem from ours since there is no hypersonic similarity structure. The reason is that the wedge angle (or cone angle) θ in [17,18,19,20] is fixed such that the similarity parameter K tends to the infinity as M ∞ → ∞. There are also many literatures on the BV solutions for the steady supersonic compressible Euler flows with free boundaries of small data such that steady supersonic flow past a Lipschitz wedge or moving over a Lipschitz bending wall (see [6,7,10,23,24] for more details) which involving the stabilities of the shock wave and rarefaction wave.…”
Section: Definition 11 (Entropy Solutions) a Weak Solution Umentioning
confidence: 87%