2001
DOI: 10.1007/s004530010057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Two Class-Constrained Versions of the Multiple Knapsack Problem

Abstract: Abstract. We study two variants of the classic knapsack problem, in which we need to place items of different types in multiple knapsacks; each knapsack has a limited capacity, and a bound on the number of different types of items it can hold: in the class-constrained multiple knapsack problem (CMKP) we wish to maximize the total number of packed items; in the fair placement problem (FPP) our goal is to place the same (large) portion from each set. We look for a perfect placement, in which both problems are so… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
67
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
67
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Placement problems have also been studied in the optimization literature, including bin packing, multiple knapsack, and multi-dimensional knapsack problems [11]. The special case of our problem with uniform memory requirements was studied in [12], and some approximation algorithms were proposed. The optimization problem that we consider presents a nonlinear optimization objective while previous approaches [8], [4] to the same problem use linear optimization objectives.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Placement problems have also been studied in the optimization literature, including bin packing, multiple knapsack, and multi-dimensional knapsack problems [11]. The special case of our problem with uniform memory requirements was studied in [12], and some approximation algorithms were proposed. The optimization problem that we consider presents a nonlinear optimization objective while previous approaches [8], [4] to the same problem use linear optimization objectives.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other related works deal with a special case of the class-constrained multiple knapsack (CCMK) problem [17], [18], in which a set of unit-sized items of m different types (u i items of type i) need to be placed in n bins; each bin has a limited capacity, t j , and a bound, a j , on the number of distinct types of items it can hold. The objective is to pack as many items as possible in the bins.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objective is to pack as many items as possible in the bins. The application of this problem to data placement on parallel disks was studied in [18] and [8]. When each knapsack is represented by a job with length t j and allotment parameter a j , and the items of type i are represented by a machine, M i , with rate u i , we get an instance of the SAC problem.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the online version, Krumke et al [15] show that the competitive ratio of GreedyFit is at least 2m, the competitive ratio of OneBin is at most 2m − 1, and that the competitive ratio of any randomized algorithm is Ω(m) even if it is allowed to use more than m bins simultaneously. The Bin Coloring problem is also related to class-contrained knapsack problems [23,24]. In those versions of the knapsack problem, each item is characterized by a size and a color and each knapsack has an additional limit on the number of different colors that it can hold.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%