2022
DOI: 10.4000/bmsap.9594
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On two cases of brucellosis in southern France in the mediaeval and modern periods (Saint-Sauveur Abbey, Aniane; La Closeraie, Aix-en-Provence)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there are several reasons why brucellosis may be under-reported in paleopathological analyses of archaeological samples; it is likely mistaken for other diseases that similarly impact bone like tuberculosis, the bacterium had not left skeletal changes by the time of death [7,11,12], or the non-specific nature of the lesions precluded a diagnosis [12]. Support for the presence of brucellosis during the Medieval period includes an ancient genome identified from a pelvic nodule of an individual in Sardinia dating to c. 1300 CE; two individuals from Albania (c. 900-c. 1200 CE) with PCR products arising from lesioned ribs and vertebrae; and two French individuals from the 14 th and 18 th C. CE where an infection was identified via paleopathology [13][14][15]. This limited DNA evidence compared to other infectious diseases could be due to improper sample selection [16], poor DNA preservation [12,17,18], or its mistaken diagnosis [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, there are several reasons why brucellosis may be under-reported in paleopathological analyses of archaeological samples; it is likely mistaken for other diseases that similarly impact bone like tuberculosis, the bacterium had not left skeletal changes by the time of death [7,11,12], or the non-specific nature of the lesions precluded a diagnosis [12]. Support for the presence of brucellosis during the Medieval period includes an ancient genome identified from a pelvic nodule of an individual in Sardinia dating to c. 1300 CE; two individuals from Albania (c. 900-c. 1200 CE) with PCR products arising from lesioned ribs and vertebrae; and two French individuals from the 14 th and 18 th C. CE where an infection was identified via paleopathology [13][14][15]. This limited DNA evidence compared to other infectious diseases could be due to improper sample selection [16], poor DNA preservation [12,17,18], or its mistaken diagnosis [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…900— c . 1200 CE) with PCR products arising from lesioned ribs and vertebrae; and two French individuals from the 14 th and 18 th C. CE where an infection was identified via paleopathology [ 13 15 ]. This limited DNA evidence compared to other infectious diseases could be due to improper sample selection [ 16 ], poor DNA preservation [ 12 , 17 , 18 ], or its mistaken diagnosis [ 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%