Liberalism and communitarianism have figured prominently in discussions of how to govern forensic DNA typing and databasing (hereafter: forensic DNA practices). Despite the prominence of these two political philosophies and their underlying values, no studies have looked at the governance of forensic DNA practices in a non-democratic country governed by a communitarian logic. To fill this lacuna in the literature, this article will consider Singapore as an authoritarian state governed by a communitarian philosophy. Following the introduction, the article will highlight basic innovations and technologies of forensic DNA practices, and will articulate a liberal democratic version of Lynch and McNally's (2009) "biolegality". It goes on to consider briefly various (political) philosophies (i.e. liberalism and communitarianism) and law enforcement models (i.e. due process and crime control models). The main part of the article records the trajectory, and hence biolegal progress, of forensic DNA practices in Singapore, and compares it with trajectories in England and the USA. The article ends by summarizing some of the main findings.