Globecom '00 - IEEE. Global Telecommunications Conference. Conference Record (Cat. No.00CH37137)
DOI: 10.1109/glocom.2000.892061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On traffic types and service classes in the Internet

Abstract: Abstract-In today's Internet, various traffic types having different characteristics and requirements (e.g., voice, video, best effort) share the same resources. In order to provide services that are appropriate to each, both the IETF and IEEE 802 have proposed a support for traffic differentiation. In both cases, service classes corresponding to separate queues are identified, and packets are marked according to their class, which in turn defines the treatment they will get at each hop in the network. Using r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(26 reference statements)
2
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These time limits are in line with the values specified by standards and in literature [9]. A packet exceeding this upper bound is dropped.…”
Section: Metricssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…These time limits are in line with the values specified by standards and in literature [9]. A packet exceeding this upper bound is dropped.…”
Section: Metricssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Our work [15] shows that since voice and CBR video have similar characteristics and real-time delay requirements, we may allow them to be handled together. Consider a scenario in which CBR video streams are added to a 7-hop 10Base-T network carrying a 450 Kbps aggregate voice load.…”
Section: Mixing Voice and Videomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [15], we investigate the effect of mixing and separating traffic types, i.e., which types can be mixed together in the same queue without incurring a significant loss in throughput, and which types need to be separated to meet performance objectives. We first consider the impact of data traffic on voice traffic by mixing 1 Mbps of voice traffic (11 streams) with TCP data traffic.…”
Section: Mixing Voice and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of these stringent requirements and particular characteristics, voice traffic should be treated differently than other traffic in the network. In fact, measurements on the Internet [25] as well as simulation studies [19] have shown that mixing voice traffic with both traditional TCP data traffic and UDP VBR video traffic can lead to either low average link utilization if delay requirements are met, or larger than desired delay for voice. Accordingly, allowing a mixture of voice with other traffic can lead to the need of complex admission control policies if the end-to-end delay requirements for voice were to be satisfied [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%