2013
DOI: 10.1007/s12038-013-9328-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On toxic effects of scientific journals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, the topic is an inherent aspect of science and of how scientists work as human beings; secondly, although judging "significance" in terms of quasiobjective scientometric tools is a near-universal practice, in reality this judgment is often distorted due to human factors [22][23][24] ; thirdly, the topic has close ties with some of the Mental Traps, as I will argue later. Firstly, the topic is an inherent aspect of science and of how scientists work as human beings; secondly, although judging "significance" in terms of quasiobjective scientometric tools is a near-universal practice, in reality this judgment is often distorted due to human factors [22][23][24] ; thirdly, the topic has close ties with some of the Mental Traps, as I will argue later.…”
Section: Pillar 19 the Meaning Of "Significant" Scientific Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Firstly, the topic is an inherent aspect of science and of how scientists work as human beings; secondly, although judging "significance" in terms of quasiobjective scientometric tools is a near-universal practice, in reality this judgment is often distorted due to human factors [22][23][24] ; thirdly, the topic has close ties with some of the Mental Traps, as I will argue later. Firstly, the topic is an inherent aspect of science and of how scientists work as human beings; secondly, although judging "significance" in terms of quasiobjective scientometric tools is a near-universal practice, in reality this judgment is often distorted due to human factors [22][23][24] ; thirdly, the topic has close ties with some of the Mental Traps, as I will argue later.…”
Section: Pillar 19 the Meaning Of "Significant" Scientific Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[22][23][24] Although an analysis of this topic is clearly outside the scope and intentions of the present discourse, the issue simply cannot be sidestepped if we place the focus on the anthropic nature of science, and if we understand that in practice scientists "function" and therefore science "happens" very much in a social context. As already indicated under Pillar 19, there is a growing worldwide opposition to the practice of scientometrics, and several acclaimed scientists have highlighted the fundamental flaws and distorting nature of the system.…”
Section: Interludementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this advance proved relevant for the advancement of long-lived state order (Pileio, 2020;Teleanu et al, 2021;Pileio, 2017;Bengs et al, 2020) and was more challenging to obtain than the two-dimensional spectroscopy application for the study of singlet-state-based exchange we describe in the same paper (SS-EXSY) (Sarkar et al, 2007). In the tradition of finding low-key names for sequences such as "INEPT" (Morris and Freeman, 1979) or "INADEQUATE" (Bax et al, 1980), we could have named the zero-quantum rotation block of the pulse sequence in Fig. 1 a "(ZZ-)ZEROTATION".…”
Section: Zero-quantum Rotation In the Starting Block Of Long-lived Statesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Some authors also express anxiety arising from the potential conflict between wanting to share their output yet needing to retain ownership of the work. Substantial power is still held by a small subset of traditional journals and editorial boards who are keen to maintain the status quo , exerting an influence that – at times – can be ‘toxic’ 25 .…”
Section: Future Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%