2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlamp.2014.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On topologies defined by irreducible sets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, in the classical setting, the above corresponding problem is also unsolved, that is, whether the category KBSob of k-bounded sober spaces is a full reflective subcategory of Top 0 . In the concluding remarks of [32], Zhao and Ho asked whether KB(X) (the set of all closed irreducible sets of a T 0 space X whose suprema exist) is the canonical k-bounded sobrification of X in the sense of Keimel and Lawson with respect to the map x −→ cl({x}). Zhao, Lu and Wang (see [30]) constructed a counterexample to illustrate that (KB(X), cl) is not the canonical k-bounded sobrification of a T 0 space X in the sense of Keimel and Lawson.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In fact, in the classical setting, the above corresponding problem is also unsolved, that is, whether the category KBSob of k-bounded sober spaces is a full reflective subcategory of Top 0 . In the concluding remarks of [32], Zhao and Ho asked whether KB(X) (the set of all closed irreducible sets of a T 0 space X whose suprema exist) is the canonical k-bounded sobrification of X in the sense of Keimel and Lawson with respect to the map x −→ cl({x}). Zhao, Lu and Wang (see [30]) constructed a counterexample to illustrate that (KB(X), cl) is not the canonical k-bounded sobrification of a T 0 space X in the sense of Keimel and Lawson.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The upper topology ν(Q) on Q is the topology generated by sets of the form X− ↓ x for x ∈ Q, where ↓ x = {a ∈ Q | a ≤ x}. Then (Q, ν(Q)) is k-bounded sober, but not bounded sober (see Example 4.14 in [32]). By Proposition 3.13 and 4.9, the stratified Q-cotopological space ω Q (Q) is k-bounded sober, but not bounded sober.…”
Section: This Means Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Clearly, P H (X) = (C(X) \ {∅}, υ(C(X) \ {∅})). So P H (X) is always sober (see, e.g., [17,Corollary 4.10]). The space P H (Irr c (X)), shortly denoted by X s , with the topological embedding η X (= x → {x}) : X −→ P H (Irr c (X)), is the canonical soberification of X (cf.…”
Section: A Nonempty Subsetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The working principle which uses irreducible sets as the topological counterparts of directed sets is now called Zhao-Ho replacement principle in [1]. A subset U of a T 0 space X is SI-open if and only if (i) U is open in X and (ii) if F is irreducible in X then F ∈ U implies F ∩ U ∅ whenever F exists [9]. By observing the fact that Alexandroff-irreducible sets are exactly the directed sets, SI-topology appears to be a proper generalisation of the Scott topology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%