2018
DOI: 10.1088/1751-8121/aaeea1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On topological quantum computing with mapping class group representations

Abstract: We propose an encoding for topological quantum computation utilizing quantum representations of mapping class groups. Leakage into a non-computational subspace seems to be unavoidable for universality. We are interested in the possible gate sets which can emerge in this setting. As a first step, we prove that for abelian anyons, all gates from these mapping class group representations are normalizer gates. Results of Van den Nest then allow us to conclude that for abelian anyons this quantum computing scheme c… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We will simply use Z r (f ) to denote Z r (M f ). It is in general very hard to compute directly, for example see [7] for the explicit formula for the set of Dehn twists generating the mapping class group, but for some special mapping class it is easy to write down the matrix. When f = T γ is the right (left) Dehn tiwst along a curve γ, then M f can be presented by surgery on the curve γ × { 1 2 } ⊂ Σ g × I, which is ∓1 framed relative to the surface Σ g × { 1 2 } (denoted by γ ∓ ).…”
Section: Figure 7 the F-movementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will simply use Z r (f ) to denote Z r (M f ). It is in general very hard to compute directly, for example see [7] for the explicit formula for the set of Dehn twists generating the mapping class group, but for some special mapping class it is easy to write down the matrix. When f = T γ is the right (left) Dehn tiwst along a curve γ, then M f can be presented by surgery on the curve γ × { 1 2 } ⊂ Σ g × I, which is ∓1 framed relative to the surface Σ g × { 1 2 } (denoted by γ ∓ ).…”
Section: Figure 7 the F-movementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the notations and terminologies, see for example [56]. The mapping class group representations are explicitly described in [80].…”
Section: Jhep10(2020)129mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To understand the representations of MCGs Γ g from the Ising TQFT, we will use four different bases of the Hilbert spaces V iTQFT (Σ g ): the defining basis {e a b }, the standard basis {v i k }, the geometric basis {u i k }, and the spin basis {ω m l } -the last three bases are defined and used in [41], and the defining basis is used in [80]. The defining basis and standard basis consist of labeled fusion graphs using {1, σ, ψ}.…”
Section: Jhep10(2020)129mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, some simplified methods or one and two transformations are used to get the approximate solution, for example the mean field method which considers the far particle-particle interaction as a field effect, and the Jordan-Wigner transformation which maps the interaction of particles onto a fermion representation [1,2]. Intermediate statistics is a hot topic in physics these decades, e.g., in topological quantum computation [3][4][5][6][7], quantum material [8,9], and quantum information [10]. If the interacting manybody system is intermediate statistical system, getting the approximate solution or even the low dimensional exact solution becomes more difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%