On the Widespread Use of an Inappropriate and Restrictive Model of the Literary Aphorism

Stephenson, R. H.

doi:10.2307/3727888

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The definition of an aphorism varies widely, but many scholars of the modern aphorism point to Francis Bacon’s emphasis on aphoristic writing as a means of counteracting the orthodoxy of medieval scholarship (Stephenson 1980:3). For Bacon, the purpose of an aphorism was to get readers thinking on their own, absent a long string of arguments whose forward movement can distract from its potential errors.…”

Section: How Aphorisms Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

On the Ambivalence of the Aphorism in Sociological Theory

Crosbie

Guhin

2019

Sociological Theory

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sociologists have long been taken by certain pithy expressions from the founders of the discipline. We propose here both a new explanation for the endurance of these statements as well as an analysis of the power, limitations, and possibilities of aphorisms. By drawing from the critical scholarship concerned with aphorisms, we demonstrate that some of the allure of the classical sociological texts derives from their form, and particularly their reliance on the relative autonomy of the aphorism. Through examining Marx’s “opiate of the people,” Weber’s “iron cage,” and, briefly, two more contemporary sociological aphorisms, we suggest that aphorisms have an ambivalent role in sociological theory: they make claims memorable even as they potentially oversimplify complex arguments. Yet that very simplification can provide a point of focus for productive misreading and reinterpretation.

show abstract

Section: How Aphorisms Workmentioning

confidence: 99%