2021
DOI: 10.1080/1369183x.2021.1873116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the West–East methodological bias in measuring international migration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the migration processes discussed above will also affect official statistics for the estimated percentage of foreign-born residents within these two countries, as these specific migrant groups will count as foreign-born (Gorodzeisky and Leykin, 2021). In order to ensure this does not confound my results, I reestimate my models without including percent foreign-born as a control variable.…”
Section: Robustness Checksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the migration processes discussed above will also affect official statistics for the estimated percentage of foreign-born residents within these two countries, as these specific migrant groups will count as foreign-born (Gorodzeisky and Leykin, 2021). In order to ensure this does not confound my results, I reestimate my models without including percent foreign-born as a control variable.…”
Section: Robustness Checksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of postsocialist societies in Central and Eastern Europe, this dominance is reinforced by both the legacy of the Cold War and the internal hierarchies of Europe, which have consistently construed Eastern Europe as subordinate and inferior to Western Europe (Koobak and Marling, 2014; Krivonos and Näre, 2019). For instance, analytical concepts, tools and models forged in Western European political and social contexts continue to be uncritically applied in social research depicting social realities in Central and Eastern Europe (Gorodzeisky and Leykin, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inspiration for our critique derives from the scholarly literature problematizing the Euro-and western-centric nature of social scientific knowledge (e.g. Chakrabarty, 2007;Gorodzeisky and Leykin, 2022;Krause, 2016). Postcolonial scholarship has highlighted the inadequacy of accepted scholarly concepts in describing the realities of the Global South, calling for the integration of indigenous social theory, generated outside of the western core, into a sociological canon (Bhambra and de Sousa Santos, 2017;Chakrabarty, 2007;Connell, 1997Connell, , 2007Onwuzuruigbo, 2018;Patel, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although they would qualify as migrants according to this deHinition, ofHicial guidelines recommend to not include cross-border workers, diplomatic and military personnel and their dependents and nomads into ofHicial migration statistics (UNSD, 1998: 13). Furthermore, it has been shown that the use of data on country of birth or citizenship for the production of migration statistics implicates the migrantization of millions of people who have never crossed an international border but whose country of usual residence has changed due to geopolitical repercussions such as the dissolution of Yugoslavia or the Soviet Union (Gorodzeisky & Leykin, 2021). However, we believe -and this is our second point -that such liminal cases allow scholars -precisely because of their liminality, ambiguity and contingency -to highlight the implications of the 'national order of things' for people who are labelled and targeted as migrants in order to show that the real problem is not migration, but the volatile and violent nation-state system generating this phenomenon in the Hirst place.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%