2003
DOI: 10.1111/1468-2354.t01-2-00085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Welfare Cost of Economic Fluctuations in Developing Countries*

Abstract: Macroeconomic fluctuations are much stronger in developing countries than in the United States. Yet, while a large literature debates the welfare cost of economic fluctuations in the United States, it remains an open question how large that cost is in developing countries. Using several models, we provide such a measure. We find that the welfare cost of consumption volatility per se is far from trivial and averages a substantial multiple of the corresponding U.S. estimate. Moreover, in many poor countries, the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
135
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 213 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
7
135
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is interesting to point out that our conservative estimates are similar to the welfare costs of rare disasters estimated by Barro (2006). Even neglecting transition and investment effects and without considering risk aversion, our welfare estimates of output collapses are larger than the standard welfare costs of eliminating fluctuations in consumption in developing countries, which according to Pallage and Robe (2003) are equivalent to around 0.34 percent of permanent consumption in developing countries. 24 TFP reduction is a pure welfare cost, permanent in the case of TFP destruction and transitory if TFP eventually recovers after a transition.…”
Section: The Costs Of Productivity Lossessupporting
confidence: 55%
“…It is interesting to point out that our conservative estimates are similar to the welfare costs of rare disasters estimated by Barro (2006). Even neglecting transition and investment effects and without considering risk aversion, our welfare estimates of output collapses are larger than the standard welfare costs of eliminating fluctuations in consumption in developing countries, which according to Pallage and Robe (2003) are equivalent to around 0.34 percent of permanent consumption in developing countries. 24 TFP reduction is a pure welfare cost, permanent in the case of TFP destruction and transitory if TFP eventually recovers after a transition.…”
Section: The Costs Of Productivity Lossessupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Pritchett 2000, Koren andTenreyro 2007). There is limited evidence on the welfare costs of income volatility in developing countries (Pallage and Robe 2003). These welfare costs are likely to be high for two reasons.…”
Section: Motivation and Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the research on firm growth effects of exchange rate uncertainty has been much limited with an exclusive focus on publicly traded firms located mostly in developed countries despite substantial structural differences between developed and developing countries, and between publicly traded and non-traded firms. The lack of research on developing country experiences is especially surprising given that developing countries face higher levels of exchange rate uncertainty with stronger negative welfare effects than developed countries (Pallage and Robe, 2003). The exclusive focus on the publicly traded firms is also striking because of the structural differences between publicly traded and non-traded firms, and the low market capitalization rates in developing countries that limit sample sizes substantially.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%