2013
DOI: 10.1038/leu.2013.333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the way towards a ‘CLL prognostic index’: focus on TP53, BIRC3, SF3B1, NOTCH1 and MYD88 in a population-based cohort

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
75
1
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
75
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[32][33][34][35][36][37] That said, 32% (176/557) of cases analyzed concerned M-CLL, subset #2 (n=98) (mixed SHM profile) and subset #4 (n=78), and the complete absence of MYD88 mutations amongst these cases implies that mutations within MYD88 are absent from M-CLL assigned to major stereotyped subsets.…”
Section: Myd88 Mutationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[32][33][34][35][36][37] That said, 32% (176/557) of cases analyzed concerned M-CLL, subset #2 (n=98) (mixed SHM profile) and subset #4 (n=78), and the complete absence of MYD88 mutations amongst these cases implies that mutations within MYD88 are absent from M-CLL assigned to major stereotyped subsets.…”
Section: Myd88 Mutationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This case displayed a prominently nodular growth pattern and cytology that appeared much more consistent with a diagnosis of nodal marginal zone lymphoma with plasmacytic differentiation. MYD88 L265P has also been described in a small percentage of chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma, 15,21,25,26,40,41 emphasizing that MYD88 mutation status alone clearly cannot be used to define lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma. The MYD88 L265P abnormality has also been reported in a small percentage of cases diagnosed as extranodal marginal zone lymphoma, 19,20 although distinction between extranodal marginal zone lymphoma with plasmacytic differentiation and an extranodal lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma may be somewhat arbitrary, and the prior studies included insufficient clinical or histologic information to completely exclude extranodal lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma.…”
Section: F Hamadeh Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In CLL, besides TP53 and ATM mutations, which are both known to confer poor prognosis, recent high-throughput NGS studies have revealed recurrent mutations within NOTCH1, SF3B1, and BIRC3 for example, that were reported to be associated with poor clinical outcome with higher frequencies in relapsing/treatment-refractory CLL and in Richter's syndrome. 48,[69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79] More recent studies have also identified additional gene mutations that may confer a worse outcome in CLL, e.g. NKFBIE, EGR2, and RPS15, although they have been studied less.…”
Section: Genes With Prognostic Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%