1957
DOI: 10.2514/8.3934
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Vibration of Thin Cylindrical Shells Under Internal Pressure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1961
1961
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, these studies have been done in complicated systems where it is difficult to uncouple the effects of the vibrating structure from the pulsation of the granular material. In particular, understanding the source of measured tube wall vibration frequencies without a good numerical or theoretical model is difficult [9]. Further, a study has been conducted where the measured natural frequency of free vertical oscillation of the structure was significantly larger than the pulsation frequency, suggesting resonance did not occur [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, these studies have been done in complicated systems where it is difficult to uncouple the effects of the vibrating structure from the pulsation of the granular material. In particular, understanding the source of measured tube wall vibration frequencies without a good numerical or theoretical model is difficult [9]. Further, a study has been conducted where the measured natural frequency of free vertical oscillation of the structure was significantly larger than the pulsation frequency, suggesting resonance did not occur [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the tiny fiber taper being used to excite the microbubble vertically, outer diameter of microbubble is far larger than that of fiber taper and the axial dimension (≈cm) of sensor is far larger than its transverse dimension (≈100 μm), and it will be a reasonable simplified model by approximating the sensor with cylindrical shell model. The breathing mode mechanical resonant frequency of the sensor can be described as [ 42–44 ] f2=14π2ρH{EHR2(π/L)4[(π/L)2+(n/R)2]2+D[(π/L)2+(n/R)2]+Nx(πL)2+Nφ(nR)2}where R is the outer radius, H is the wall thickness, and L is the distance between two UV glue points. E is the Young's modulus and ρ is the mass density.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modal response of thin-walled tanks is particularly sensitive to variations in pressure [7]. Pressure sensitivity complicates each of the mass measurements discussed above at low tank pressures.…”
Section: Spectral Density Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tank wall stiffness is sensitively dependent on the ullage pressure in the tank. For thin-walled tanks at low pressure, variations in the tank pressure due to draining, filling, or pressurizing operations can have a significant effect on the modal frequencies of low-lying modes (ω k ≪ ω c ) [7]. Changes in pressure can therefore confound mass measurements as the stiffness effect on modal frequencies is counter to the effect of changes in effective mass.…”
Section: Modal Stiffnessmentioning
confidence: 99%