1985
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-460x(85)80054-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the variation and invertibility of room impulse response functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
49
0
5

Year Published

1993
1993
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
49
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Our empirical results are in accordance with the observation reported in [40], where it is stated that inverse filtering increases the distortion when a response recorded at a different position is employed for dereverberation. Radlovic et al [45] gave a theoretical analysis on the sensitivity of inverse filtering.…”
Section: B Sensitivity Of Inverse Filteringsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our empirical results are in accordance with the observation reported in [40], where it is stated that inverse filtering increases the distortion when a response recorded at a different position is employed for dereverberation. Radlovic et al [45] gave a theoretical analysis on the sensitivity of inverse filtering.…”
Section: B Sensitivity Of Inverse Filteringsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In the single-point case, the loudspeaker-room response is equalized for a 'sweet spot,' which may be the main listening position or a microphone location. However, this approach usually decreases the sound quality at other locations in the room, and thus is rarely a good solution [164,172,173]. In multi-point room equalization, the response is measured at two or more listening positions, and the equalizer is designed to improve the response at all of them.…”
Section: Room Equalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To simulate both convolutive and additive distortions in our mixture signals, we specify in each configuration a random location for the microphone and then choose two other locations for two sources (target and interference) randomly but control source-microphone distances to ensure that close-talking scenarios are avoided and signal-to-reverberant energy ratios are roughly constant in each simulated room. Note that, even in the same room, the RIRs from different source locations to the microphone may differ significantly [23], [27]. Consequently, a reverberant mixture is created by convolving each source with its corresponding RIR and mixing the two reverberant sources at 0-dB SNR.…”
Section: A Data Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%