1990
DOI: 10.1007/bf01233420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the vanishing of local cohomology modules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
73
0
3

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
73
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The cohomological dimension has been studied by several authors; see, for example, Faltings [7], Hartshorne [9] and Huneke−Lyubeznik [11]. In particular in [7] and [11], several upper bounds for cohomological dimension were obtained. The main aim of this article is to establish lower bounds for cohomological dimension of finitely generated modules over a local ring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The cohomological dimension has been studied by several authors; see, for example, Faltings [7], Hartshorne [9] and Huneke−Lyubeznik [11]. In particular in [7] and [11], several upper bounds for cohomological dimension were obtained. The main aim of this article is to establish lower bounds for cohomological dimension of finitely generated modules over a local ring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For an R-module M , the cohomological dimension of M with respect to a is defined as cd(a, M) := max{i ∈ Z : H i a (M ) = 0}. The cohomological dimension has been studied by several authors; see, for example, Faltings [7], Hartshorne [9] and Huneke−Lyubeznik [11]. In particular in [7] and [11], several upper bounds for cohomological dimension were obtained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For an extensive list of references and some open questions we recommend to consult the very nice survey article [17].…”
Section: The Master Planmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that in R we can use the second vanishing theorem, due to Ogus, Hartshorne-Speiser and Huneke-Lyubeznik (see [3], Theorem 1. Ja (R) so that λ 2,2 (R/I) = a−1+1.…”
Section: Pure Dimension Twomentioning
confidence: 99%