2020
DOI: 10.1002/jper.20-0487
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the value of the 2017 classification of phenotype and gingival recessions

Abstract: The 2017 World Workshop completely restructured knowledge in periodontology with a series of official consensus statements jointly agreed upon by the American Academy of Periodontology and the European Federation of Periodontology. Among them, the 2017 classification of phenotype and gingival recession successfully incorporated the most relevant previous classifications into a treatmentoriented diagnostic matrix. Despite the significant advantages related with the implementation of this new classification of g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding host‐related factors, a 20‐year study on CAF+CTG showed how baseline recession diagnosis, narrow KT, and cervical abrasion negatively affected stability of the gingival margin 8 . Previous literature clearly established that surface characteristics play a crucial role on outcomes after root coverage, and a classification of cervical defects (CDs) was developed to facilitate diagnosis as well as treatment of recessions with cervical abrasion defects 15,16 . The proposed four classes rely on the visibility of the CEJ (A: detectable; B: non detectable) and on the presence of surface discrepancies (+: presence of root steps; ‐: absence of root steps).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding host‐related factors, a 20‐year study on CAF+CTG showed how baseline recession diagnosis, narrow KT, and cervical abrasion negatively affected stability of the gingival margin 8 . Previous literature clearly established that surface characteristics play a crucial role on outcomes after root coverage, and a classification of cervical defects (CDs) was developed to facilitate diagnosis as well as treatment of recessions with cervical abrasion defects 15,16 . The proposed four classes rely on the visibility of the CEJ (A: detectable; B: non detectable) and on the presence of surface discrepancies (+: presence of root steps; ‐: absence of root steps).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-carious cervical lesions can be able to reduce the chances of root coverage by causing modification to the root surface and creating steps (concavity) in dentin [4]. By altering the morphology of the root surface, the root concavities limit the biologic limits for root coverage during grafting procedures [10].…”
Section: Figure 2: Picture Showing Types Of Recession Classification ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Para Prato et al (2021) no procedimento de recobrimento radicular, é indispensável que o cirurgião dentista leve em consideração o fenótipo gengival de seu paciente, a gengiva da área doadora e receptora no processo cirúrgico pois os mesmos têm bastante influência no sucesso do caso.…”
Section: Relato De Casounclassified