On the value of preprints: An early career researcher perspective

Abstract

Peer-reviewed journal publication is the main means for academic researchers in the life sciences to create a permanent public record of their work. These publications are also the de facto currency for career progress, with a strong link between journal brand recognition and perceived value. The current peer-review process can lead to long delays between submission and publication, with cycles of rejection, revision, and resubmission causing redundant peer review. This situation creates unique challenges for early career researchers (ECRs), who rely heavily on timely publication of their work to gain recognition for their efforts. Today, ECRs face a changing academic landscape, including the increased interdisciplinarity of life sciences research, expansion of the researcher population, and consequent shifts in employer and funding demands. The publication of preprints, publicly available scientific manuscripts posted on dedicated preprint servers prior to journal-managed peer review, can play a key role in addressing these ECR challenges. Preprinting benefits include rapid dissemination of academic work, open access, establishing priority or concurrence, receiving feedback, and facilitating collaborations. Although there is a growing appreciation for and adoption of preprints, a minority of all articles in life sciences and medicine are preprinted. The current low rate of preprint submissions in life sciences and ECR concerns regarding preprinting need to be addressed. We provide a perspective from an interdisciplinary group of ECRs on the value of preprints and advocate their wide adoption to advance knowledge and facilitate career development.

Understanding Links Between Social Media Use, Sleep and Mental Health: Recent Progress and Current Challenges

“…PsyArXiv) before peer review and publication in an academic journal (https://psyarxiv.com). Preprints offer a simple way to accelerate communication of new findings, with benefits for authors and the field as a whole [91], which can be especially valuable when studying rapidly evolving phenomena like social media use.…”

Quantifying the Growth of Preprint Services Hosted by the Center for Open Science

“…The increased use of preprints has the potential to transform scholarly communication, and many interlinked justifications have been used to spur on the adoption of preprint use (e.g., [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]). Preprints allow for rapid public access to new research findings, a way to establish precedent for a research idea, and visibility for early-career researchers.…”

Introducing Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs)

“…Finally, a potentially off-putting aspect of a MOOP is participants' fear that their ideas will be stolen, either with or without credit, if they are shared publicly prior to any sort of formal publication. However, since there is a record of who is making contributions and sharing ideas, if this dark scenario happens, it should be addressed in a similar way as cases of 'scooping' when it comes to preprints (Sarabipour et al 2019). The risk of scooping can also be mitigated by building a team with high integrity and close personal relationships.…”