2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-014-2323-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Validity of Environmental Performance Metrics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
118
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 210 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
118
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The ASSET4 database enjoys recognition for its complete ratings of social responsibility, including environmental, corporate governance, economic and social dimensions, providing objective, comparable and systematic extra-financial information that is assessed by independent external social audits [100]. This database, founded in 2003, collects and compiles publicly available information on firms' CSR strategies using 750 individual data points, combined into over 280 key performance indicators from over 4612 large firms distributed around the world and belonging to several industries.…”
Section: Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ASSET4 database enjoys recognition for its complete ratings of social responsibility, including environmental, corporate governance, economic and social dimensions, providing objective, comparable and systematic extra-financial information that is assessed by independent external social audits [100]. This database, founded in 2003, collects and compiles publicly available information on firms' CSR strategies using 750 individual data points, combined into over 280 key performance indicators from over 4612 large firms distributed around the world and belonging to several industries.…”
Section: Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the literature reveals considerable diversity in the conceptual understanding of SRI (Höchstädter & Scheck, ) albeit with a tendency to focus on financial concepts, particularly the financial performance of SRI portfolios (Capelle‐Blancard & Monjon, ). The ESG literature has also raised issues regarding the transparency and reliability of existing metrics (Dorfleitner, Halbritter, & Nguyen, ; Semenova & Hassel, ). However, the diversity of SRI literature is not well mapped, and there is little understanding of the importance of ESG metrics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This credibility is also visibly reflected in an increased reliance on the data provided by CSR rating agencies (principally categorised in terms of environmental-, social-and governance-related items) by many academic studies. This is motivated by a search for quantitative proxies of corporate social performance (Igalens et al, 2008;Bessire & Onnee, 2010;Semenova & Hassel, 2014;Scott et al, 2014), particularly those deemed to be outside the direct control of the reporting enterprise (Parguel et al, 2011). Bessire & Onnee (2010) argue that many agencies adopt a utilitarian ideology privileging scientific methods, quantitative measures (metrics), financial-led clients and transparency of the methodologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%