1973
DOI: 10.1086/129506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Use of Trigonometric Parallaxes for the Calibration of Luminosity Systems: Theory

Abstract: Trumpler and Weaver (1953) discuss a systematic error which they attribute to the process of selecting stars by a lower limit in parallax values. The systematic error is introduced because, on the average, the observed parallaxes are larger than the true parallaxes. We demonstrate that the same type of systematic effect exists for all stars with observed trigonometric parallaxes. The problem is treated analytically and can be put in a dimensionless form. The size of the systematic error depends only upon the r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
477
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 498 publications
(486 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(1 reference statement)
9
477
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the 70 parallax measurements listed in Table 8, about 40 are based on VLBI observations, one (PSR J0633 +1746) based on optical astrometry with the Hubble Space Telescope, and the remainder based on pulse timing analyses. Measured parallaxes of low significance are biased by the "Lutz-Kelker" effect (Lutz & Kelker 1973). This has been considered in the context of pulsar parallax measurements by Verbiest et al (2012) and we have adopted their corrected distance estimates where available.…”
Section: Distances From Annual Parallaxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 70 parallax measurements listed in Table 8, about 40 are based on VLBI observations, one (PSR J0633 +1746) based on optical astrometry with the Hubble Space Telescope, and the remainder based on pulse timing analyses. Measured parallaxes of low significance are biased by the "Lutz-Kelker" effect (Lutz & Kelker 1973). This has been considered in the context of pulsar parallax measurements by Verbiest et al (2012) and we have adopted their corrected distance estimates where available.…”
Section: Distances From Annual Parallaxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6. Lutz-Kelker corrections (Lutz & Kelker 1973; have not been adopted to refine the Hipparcos parallaxes, as they should not be applied to measurements of individual stars (van Leeuwen 2007, p. 87). Their potential impact is nevertheless rather small for the present sample stars, as visualised in Fig.…”
Section: Stellar Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This traces directly back to a better known example, such as the bias between parallaxes and distances (e.g. Lutz & Kelker 1973;Casagrande et al 2007) Let us consider the case of transforming a magnitude m into a heterochromatic flux F , which (from Eq. 1) involves the following non-linear relation …”
Section: Appendix B: Bias In a Non-linear Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%