Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1996
DOI: 10.1109/20.497322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the use of the magnetic vector potential in the nodal and edge finite element analysis of 3D magnetostatic problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
51
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
51
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Gauging of the solution is an important issue and appropriate conditions are often added to the governing equations. However, some recent publications on numerical methods suggest that gauging may not always be necessary [2,7,17]. By using numerical techniques such as relaxation methods or ICCG, one of the possible solutions is found satisfying the equations for potentials.…”
Section: Methods Substitutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Gauging of the solution is an important issue and appropriate conditions are often added to the governing equations. However, some recent publications on numerical methods suggest that gauging may not always be necessary [2,7,17]. By using numerical techniques such as relaxation methods or ICCG, one of the possible solutions is found satisfying the equations for potentials.…”
Section: Methods Substitutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using numerical techniques such as relaxation methods or ICCG, one of the possible solutions is found satisfying the equations for potentials. Finding one of the solutions may be faster than searching for the only one satisfying the gauge conditions [2,17].…”
Section: Methods Substitutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Another milestone development was the introduction of 'Edge Elements' and differential forms. Known more generally as 'Whitney forms' these elements were first presented to the CEM community by Bossavit [39,40], followed by Biro et al [41] and Tsibouikis et al [42]. It is also argued that, in comparison to the vector calculus description, differential forms make electromagnetism simpler, clearer, and more intuitive [43,44] as the relationships may be illustrated by simple diagrams [45].…”
Section: Computational Electromagnetics For Design Optimisationmentioning
confidence: 99%