2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10704-018-0270-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the use of non-iterative methods in cohesive fracture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there is no correlation between the observed “one real root” case and the onset of redistribution in any of the steps resulting in the intermittent proportional loading . The need for such a redistribution in a quasi‐static setup of SLA for non‐proportional SLA simulations is currently being investigated for cases when the constant load continues to drop gradually to very low values, indicating structural failure as has been previously interpreted and comparisons are being carried out between the available redistribution strategies() in literature, in a smeared crack setup. Nevertheless, the constant load in this study of ST4 is restored to its full value after each set of these redistribution steps.…”
Section: Validation Studies Against Experimental Benchmarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, there is no correlation between the observed “one real root” case and the onset of redistribution in any of the steps resulting in the intermittent proportional loading . The need for such a redistribution in a quasi‐static setup of SLA for non‐proportional SLA simulations is currently being investigated for cases when the constant load continues to drop gradually to very low values, indicating structural failure as has been previously interpreted and comparisons are being carried out between the available redistribution strategies() in literature, in a smeared crack setup. Nevertheless, the constant load in this study of ST4 is restored to its full value after each set of these redistribution steps.…”
Section: Validation Studies Against Experimental Benchmarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method is a proven alternative for applications in masonry, reinforced concrete, and glass . Advancements in SLA include contributions to make the procedure mesh objective,() saw‐tooth laws for extremely brittle materials with snap back at constitutive level like glass, extension to non‐proportional loading situations,() stepwise secant Coulomb friction laws, combined incremental‐total approaches like non‐iterative energy–based method and the automatic method, SLA in a stochastic setting, combining SLA with crack tracking technique, and mesh‐free SLA . Despite the active contributions of several researchers, the topic of non‐proportional loading in SLA continues to be a debated one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been a proven alternative to traditional incremental‐iterative methods for NLFEA of quasi‐brittle structures. SLA, thus far, has had contributions in the contexts of mesh‐objectivity, saw‐tooth laws for extremely brittle materials with snap‐back at constitutive level like glass, extension to non‐proportional loading situations, stepwise secant Coulomb friction laws, creep‐induced cracking, combined incremental‐total approaches like Non‐Iterative Energy‐based Method (NIEM) and the automatic method, combining SLA with a crack tracking technique and non‐proportional loading strategies for three‐dimensional (3D) stress states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%