2020
DOI: 10.1109/jiot.2019.2962976
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Use of LoRaWAN in Smart Cities: A Study With Blocking Interference

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, previous literature evaluated LoRa range, obtaining up to 30 km for boat communications and 15 km for car communications [40], up to 8 km (but losing many packets) and up to 4 km (losing a few packets) within urban environments [41], up to 500 m for very dense-vegetation environments [42] and a radius coverage of 1.8 km for a soil monitoring system in agriculture by means of LoRa devices with worse performance in terms of sensitivity than the ones used in this article [43]. Besides range, LoRa and LoRaWAN have other features that are attractive for smart irrigation deployments: their energy consumption is relative low (RX current is usually around 10 mA, while deep-sleep current is under 200 nA), its robustness against interference has been proven [44,45], transceiver cost is also low (less than US$ 8, as of writing) and there is no need to pay monthly fees to a mobile carrier. Nonetheless, developers must note that LoRa and LoRaWAN have not been devised to transfer large data payloads fast (the theoretical maximum data rate is usually 50 Kbps for LoRa and 27 Kbps for LoRaWAN) and they make use of Industrial-Scientific-Medical (ISM) bands, so interference may arise from other devices that operate in the same radio frequency.…”
Section: Key Findingsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Specifically, previous literature evaluated LoRa range, obtaining up to 30 km for boat communications and 15 km for car communications [40], up to 8 km (but losing many packets) and up to 4 km (losing a few packets) within urban environments [41], up to 500 m for very dense-vegetation environments [42] and a radius coverage of 1.8 km for a soil monitoring system in agriculture by means of LoRa devices with worse performance in terms of sensitivity than the ones used in this article [43]. Besides range, LoRa and LoRaWAN have other features that are attractive for smart irrigation deployments: their energy consumption is relative low (RX current is usually around 10 mA, while deep-sleep current is under 200 nA), its robustness against interference has been proven [44,45], transceiver cost is also low (less than US$ 8, as of writing) and there is no need to pay monthly fees to a mobile carrier. Nonetheless, developers must note that LoRa and LoRaWAN have not been devised to transfer large data payloads fast (the theoretical maximum data rate is usually 50 Kbps for LoRa and 27 Kbps for LoRaWAN) and they make use of Industrial-Scientific-Medical (ISM) bands, so interference may arise from other devices that operate in the same radio frequency.…”
Section: Key Findingsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Currently, LoRa devices are used in various IoT applications to address some of the world’s biggest challenges ranging from smart cities [ 125 ], transportation [ 126 ], energy management [ 127 ], health monitoring [ 128 ], pollution control [ 129 ] and smart farming [ 130 ].…”
Section: Low Power Wide Area Network (Lpwans) Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to guarantee the validity of the derived capturing failure probability in (26), it is necessary to investigate the convergence of the power series expansion by providing sufficient conditions that ensure its convergence. Similar to the previous section, it is considered that both the desired and the interfering signal(s) experience the Rician fading environment.…”
Section: Convergence Radiusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inter-system interference will lead to an increased capturing failure probability. The performance degradation can be avoided by some mechanisms [25][26][27]. However, such mechanisms need to estimate or exchange information about parameters of the other systems such as transmission time and transmission interval.…”
Section: Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%