2011
DOI: 10.1890/11-0538.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the use of log-transformation vs. nonlinear regression for analyzing biological power laws

Abstract: Abstract. Power-law relationships are among the most well-studied functional relationships in biology. Recently the common practice of fitting power laws using linear regression (LR) on log-transformed data has been criticized, calling into question the conclusions of hundreds of studies. It has been suggested that nonlinear regression (NLR) is preferable, but no rigorous comparison of these two methods has been conducted. Using Monte Carlo simulations, we demonstrate that the error distribution determines whi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
300
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 275 publications
(321 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
5
300
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…2 had statistically significantly nonzero linear coefficient b (with P < α; here α = 0.05), and if a least-squares quadratic regression between the independent variable log(mean) and dependent variable log(variance) did not yield a statistically significant quadratic coefficient c (P > α). The use of the doubly logarithmic scale in the testing of TL and other bivariate allometric relationships (e.g., scaling of metabolic rate with body mass) has been questioned (39,(42)(43)(44) and defended (45,46).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 had statistically significantly nonzero linear coefficient b (with P < α; here α = 0.05), and if a least-squares quadratic regression between the independent variable log(mean) and dependent variable log(variance) did not yield a statistically significant quadratic coefficient c (P > α). The use of the doubly logarithmic scale in the testing of TL and other bivariate allometric relationships (e.g., scaling of metabolic rate with body mass) has been questioned (39,(42)(43)(44) and defended (45,46).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The charts showed a nonlinear mean relationship and multiplicative, heteroscedastic, lognormal error distribution for each of the independent variables ( Figure 6). Therefore, the regression models, which were tested, were fitted in log-transformed form to the logarithm of the stem biomass, as suggested by Xiao et al (2011) andSileshi (2014). Stankova et al: Aboveground dendromass estimation of juvenile Paulownia sp.…”
Section: Model Development / Razvoj Modelamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the logarithm alters the data distribution, which may lead to misguided inferences from OLS [1,2]. Therefore the flexibility offered by GLS is expected to be beneficial in this case, as it allows the observed distribution to deviate from the modeled distribution.…”
Section: Effect Of Logarithmic Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…without logarithmic transformation. Whereas this prevents an analytic solution using OLS, the advantage is that the distribution of the data is left undistorted [1,2], while the implementation of both OLS and GLS is not significantly more complex. Indeed, the distribution of the right-hand side in (4) can be approximated by a Gaussian with mean µ mod = b 0n…”
Section: Nonlinear Scalingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation