2003
DOI: 10.1109/tsa.2003.818318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the use of linguistic consistency in systems for human-computer dialogues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further benefits can be obtained by performing MAP adaptation of a general purpose LM using augmented counts inferred from a domain specific corpus. LMs built in this way have proven to be useful also for performing sentence verification based on the consensus of recognition results obtained with different LMs (Esteve et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further benefits can be obtained by performing MAP adaptation of a general purpose LM using augmented counts inferred from a domain specific corpus. LMs built in this way have proven to be useful also for performing sentence verification based on the consensus of recognition results obtained with different LMs (Esteve et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• LC, a descriptor of linguistic confidence inspired by measures proposed in [23], is the ratio, for a given word string candidate, between the number of trigrams observed in the training corpus of the LM versus the total number of trigrams in the same word string. This measure is evaluated on the best word string containing and covering the whole utterance.…”
Section: B Confidence Classifiers Formentioning
confidence: 99%