2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2011.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the use of interaction error potentials for adaptive brain computer interfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
41
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(36 reference statements)
3
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is very likely that in progressive neurological disorders, the parameters selected in global multimodal plots will have to be modified or adapted accordingly. This is in agreement with adaptive methods which are being developed currently with the goal of improving the classifiers 5 . Also, our approach will have to be tested in a large sample of patients in the future in order to demonstrate its real clinical usefulness in daily practice.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is very likely that in progressive neurological disorders, the parameters selected in global multimodal plots will have to be modified or adapted accordingly. This is in agreement with adaptive methods which are being developed currently with the goal of improving the classifiers 5 . Also, our approach will have to be tested in a large sample of patients in the future in order to demonstrate its real clinical usefulness in daily practice.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Why use a multimodal detection of the intentionality of movement? Although the potential for BCIs in neurological disorders is huge, the applicability of current BCI systems has been limited by several factors 5 . One of them is the poor performance of BCIs based on conventional EEG analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding has created attractive opportunities for engineering applications, specifically in the field of Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCI), which allow a person to communicate solely via brain activity. It has been shown that ErrPs can be automatically detected when a BCI delivers erroneous feedback [6] and that this information can be used for correction or adaptation of BCIs [7]. Typical ErrP single-trial classification accuracies are around 70-80% and relatively stable across recording sessions; ErrP classifiers have shown to still perform well up to 600 days after initial calibration [8] and can be applied across different task sets [9].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, these modulations, termed error-related potentials, ErrP, can be reliably decoded in single-trial. This provides information about user perception of errors during brain-machine interaction bringing the possibility of correcting such errors [2], [3] or adapting the system to prevent these errors to reocurr [4], [5], [6], [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%