2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.orl.2016.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the use of independent base-stock policies in assemble-to-order inventory systems with nonidentical lead times

Abstract: We consider the use of Independent Base Stock (IBS) replenishment policies in Assemble-to-Order (ATO) inventory systems. These policies are appealingly simple and widely used, but generally suboptimal for systems with non-identical lead times. We present an IBS policy and prove that its loss of optimality is limited by the ratio of the longest lead time to the shortest one. Our results suggest that IBS policies can work well for systems where differences between lead times are dominated by their lengths.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, they allow lead times to be nonidentical. Reiman et al (2016) prove that the combination of the allocation policy used by Reiman and Wang (2015) and the independent base-stock replenishment policies is asymptotically optimal as the component lead times grow while their differences grow at a slower rate.…”
Section: Optimal Control Policiesmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, they allow lead times to be nonidentical. Reiman et al (2016) prove that the combination of the allocation policy used by Reiman and Wang (2015) and the independent base-stock replenishment policies is asymptotically optimal as the component lead times grow while their differences grow at a slower rate.…”
Section: Optimal Control Policiesmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Nadar et al (2016) LD base-stock LD rationing L Exp. Plambeck (2008) Threshold FCFS L D Plambeck and Ward (2007) Base-stock FCFS L General Reiman and Wang (2012) Base-stock -B D Reiman and Wang (2015) Base-stock Backorder target B D Reiman et al (2016) Base-stock Backorder target B D Shao and Ji 2009---D Shi and Zhao 2014Base-stock NHB B D Song and Zhao (2009) Base-stock FIFO/MFIFO B D van Jaarsveld and Scheller-Wolf 2015Base-stock FCFS B D Wan and Wang 2015-B a c k o r d e r target B D Zhao (2009) Batch-ordering FCFS B General Zhao and Simchi-Levi (2006) Base-stock and batch-ordering FCFS B General Zhou and Chao (2012) Base-stock FCFS B D/General for Markov chains. For illustration of their method, they apply it to an assemble-to-order system and study an out-of-stock situation with three possibilities, namely; backordering, fulfilled partly and lost fully.…”
Section: Performance Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though a weaker standard than being exactly optimal, asymptotic optimality provides vital guidance to formulating novel inventory policies and evaluating their performance when meeting the latter criterion is analytically intractable. Asymptotic optimality has been used to justify the use of base stock policies in lost sale inventory systems (in the regime of high penalty costs) [15], ATO inventory systems with identical lead times [26] or when differences in lead times are small relative to the lead times themselves [24], or systems with non-stationary demands and probabilistic service level constraints [33]. It also supports the use of No-Hold-Back allocation policies in assemble-toorder N and W-systems [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For systems with a single product, the policy reduces to an algorithm that is equivalent to that of Rosling (1989), and thus is exactly optimal. We also note that for systems where the different lead times are very close to one-another, the same level of asymptotic optimality can be achieved by following an independent base stock policy (Reiman et al 2016).…”
Section: Systems Withmentioning
confidence: 74%