2018
DOI: 10.1093/mnrasl/sly104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the use of Gaia magnitudes and new tables of bolometric corrections

Abstract: The availability of reliable bolometric corrections and reddening estimates, rather than the quality of parallaxes will be one of the main limiting factors in determining the luminosities of a large fraction of Gaia stars. With this goal in mind, we provide Gaia G BP , G, and G RP synthetic photometry for the entire MARCS grid, and test the performance of our synthetic colours and bolometric corrections against space-borne absolute spectrophotometry. We find indication of a magnitude-dependent offset in Gaia D… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
142
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 228 publications
(157 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(21 reference statements)
11
142
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This correction places magnitudes about 30 mmag higher than when using the Casagrande & VandenBerg (2018b) correction in the applicable magnitude range. We expect the scale of this systematic offset to have a negligible impact on our results, and therefore adopt the Casagrande & VandenBerg (2018b) correction in this work for consistency with our chosen G band extinction coefficients and bolometric corrections. Our model also uses an extinction for each star in each band.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This correction places magnitudes about 30 mmag higher than when using the Casagrande & VandenBerg (2018b) correction in the applicable magnitude range. We expect the scale of this systematic offset to have a negligible impact on our results, and therefore adopt the Casagrande & VandenBerg (2018b) correction in this work for consistency with our chosen G band extinction coefficients and bolometric corrections. Our model also uses an extinction for each star in each band.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We converted reddening to the band-specific extinction λ using extinction coefficients unique to the Green et al (2018) map for the K band 4 . For the Gaia G-band we calculated our band-specific extinction using the mean extinction coefficient presented in Casagrande & VandenBerg (2018b), after converting our reddening value to a measure of E(B − V) following the conventions presented in Green et al (2018). (Paxton et al 2011(Paxton et al , 2013(Paxton et al , 2015(for details about the physical inputs of the models see Khan et al 2018).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…G brighter and fainter than 11 mag and a correction for the G magnitude drift Weiler 2018;Casagrande & VandenBerg 2018) of 3.5 mmag per magnitude. Stars brighter than G < 6 mag have been removed to avoid saturation issues and fainter than G BP < 18 to avoid background subtraction issues (Evans et al 2018;Arenou et al 2018).…”
Section: Deriving the Extinctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Ret III, which has no available measurement of [Fe/H], we assumed the mean value for all the UFDs, which is −2.4 dex. For the reddening correction we used A G = 2.740 E(B − V ) (Casagrande & VandenBerg 2018). The excess color E(B − V ) (Schlegel et al 1998) was obtained using the python task dustmaps (Green 2018).…”
Section: Distancesmentioning
confidence: 99%