2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsp.2013.12.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the use of calibration sensors in source localization using TDOA and FDOA measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar assumption was also utilized in [17]- [19], [24], [29]. However, as pointed out in the previous subsection, the algorithm implementation uses the estimated source position instead to produce D. The amount of error introduced is dependent on the TDOA and FDOA noise as well as satellite location errors.…”
Section: B Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Similar assumption was also utilized in [17]- [19], [24], [29]. However, as pointed out in the previous subsection, the algorithm implementation uses the estimated source position instead to produce D. The amount of error introduced is dependent on the TDOA and FDOA noise as well as satellite location errors.…”
Section: B Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in [17]- [19], it is assumed that ∆y is a zero-mean Gaussian random vector with covariance matrix Q y and ∆y is also independent of the satellite location error ∆β.…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Generally, the conventional localization approach employs a two-step processing. In the first step, the measurement parameters (e.g., direction of arrival (DOA) [1], time of arrival (TOA) [2], time difference of arrival (TDOA) [3], Doppler shifts [4][5][6], and frequency difference of arrival (FDOA) [7]) are extracted from the received signal. In the second step, the transmitter position is determined by these estimated parameters via maximum likelihood criterion [8] of subspace data fusion criterion [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%