2014
DOI: 10.2172/1150671
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Use of an ER-213 Detonator to Establish a Baseline for the ER-486

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although this simplification is attractive, later experiments with CDU firesets have shown that the action-integral is not in fact constant [27,28], although this well-known fact in the detonator community has not been widely mentioned in the literature.…”
Section: (B) Firesetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although this simplification is attractive, later experiments with CDU firesets have shown that the action-integral is not in fact constant [27,28], although this well-known fact in the detonator community has not been widely mentioned in the literature.…”
Section: (B) Firesetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not observed. The ETT for different detonators varies greatly and is ≈650 ns for the RP-1 [13], ≈300 ns for the ER-213 [27] and 1.16 μs for the RP-80 [51]. Even if the absolute shock pressure measurement value is in error, the over 50% increase in pressure should have had an effect on the ETT in the event that EBW detonator function is an SDT process.…”
Section: (B) the Magnitude Of A Shock From An Ebwmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although it has been shown that some of the ETT can be accounted for by the SDT buildup process (which presumably must be highly reproducible for a given particle SA and pressing density), there is still the matter of the ignition versus bridge-burst current or CDU charge voltage. Data from [42][43][44] process produced by the bridge-burst. It has been observed previously that the functioning of EBW detonators is not just a traditional SDT process [2].…”
Section: Explosive Powder Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%