Clay Minerals Society Workshop Lecture Series 2016
DOI: 10.1346/cms-wls-21.12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the use and abuse of N2 physisorption for the characterization of the pore structure of shales

Abstract: The use of N 2 physisorption for the characterization of the pore structure of shales is assessed by addressing some common pitfalls and misconceptions related to the interpretation of physisorption data. In addition, N 2 physisorption is compared to other methods used to characterize shales. For this purpose a set of pore-structure and total-porosity data from N 2 physisorption, He-pycnometry, Hg-intrusion porosimetry, fluid saturation (Archimedes) methods, and (ultra) small-angle neutron scattering was obtai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pore size distribution may be represented by the cumulative pore volume, incremental pore volume, differential pore volume, and surface area versus pore diameter, from which, information on pore size range, dominant pore size, and pore size distribution peak can be obtained . As demonstrated by previous studies, for example, Groen et al, the adsorption branch is highly preferred for the calculation of pore size distribution and can be hardly affected by the tensile strength effect . Therefore, in the present study, the BJH method and the adsorption branch of nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherms were utilized to investigate pore size distributions within the Yanchang Formation Chang 7 Member shale samples of southwestern Ordos Basin.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Pore size distribution may be represented by the cumulative pore volume, incremental pore volume, differential pore volume, and surface area versus pore diameter, from which, information on pore size range, dominant pore size, and pore size distribution peak can be obtained . As demonstrated by previous studies, for example, Groen et al, the adsorption branch is highly preferred for the calculation of pore size distribution and can be hardly affected by the tensile strength effect . Therefore, in the present study, the BJH method and the adsorption branch of nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherms were utilized to investigate pore size distributions within the Yanchang Formation Chang 7 Member shale samples of southwestern Ordos Basin.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…One of the major uncertainties of the LPNP method is the influence of sample crushing. Primary structure and fabric will change at the microscopic level, which inevitably changes the surface properties of samples and may alter the original pore structure or generate new pore space 89 91 . During a crushing process, compression and shear forces acting on the samples also generate smaller fragments and induce fracture propagation as well 92 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adsorption and desorption were analysed at relative pressure points in the range of 0.001-0.995 and 0.995-0.1, respectively. Among the parameters calculated from the N2 adsorption analysis, Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) SSA and Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) cumulative pore area/volume and pore size distribution (2-100 nm in diameter) were calculated in this study (Bertier et al, 2016).…”
Section: Samples and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%