2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10064-019-01606-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the usability of different optical measuring techniques for joint roughness evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11 Influence of the input data in the power spectrum method for the type-profiles (simple detrending) a standard in the industry. According to Marsch et al (2020), consequently, the surface models produced with this procedure are trustworthy and useful in rock roughness evaluation.…”
Section: Data Acquisition and Handlingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…11 Influence of the input data in the power spectrum method for the type-profiles (simple detrending) a standard in the industry. According to Marsch et al (2020), consequently, the surface models produced with this procedure are trustworthy and useful in rock roughness evaluation.…”
Section: Data Acquisition and Handlingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, it is extremely important to compare the approaches for a larger dataset of profiles to evaluate their universal validity. Only Marsch et al (2020) investigated the problem rudimentary. They showed that JRC calculated from the statistical parameter Z 2 were not equal or even satisfactorily similar to JRC calculated e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e normal vector is a three-dimensional parameter that represents a plane, which can be obtained in CloudCompare software. e roughness along a joint face in different azimuths may help characterize the roughness in a more realistic way, providing insight into the variation in shear strength along different azimuths [26,34,35].…”
Section: Joint Roughnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, SfM enables estimation of the surface roughness [31,32], and the effect of the type of cameras, sensors, and lenses on roughness measurements was investigated in refs. [33,42,51,[53][54][55]. The SfM method allows investigation of the reliability of JRC values with high-resolution images [34][35][36][37]51], and photogrammetric JRC estimation for the design and stability analysis of slopes [43,44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other applications of SfM related to rock fracture characterization are prediction of peak shear strength [47], using 3D models obtained by photogrammetry for simulation of fluid flow through a fracture [48], and validation of photogrammetry data with pull and push shear tests to predict friction angle [45,50]. The method was applied successfully for different materials [51][52][53], different sample size [53], and the quality of the reconstructed model was investigated by the angular distance between subsequent images [56]. This efficient and low-cost remote sensing technique generates high-resolution digital 3D models of rock surfaces from a set of images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%